login | register
Tue 07 of Oct, 2008 (20:37 UTC)

bitweaver - Web Application Framework and CMS

Web Application Framework and CMS

Refresh cache

Bitweaver from the webmastering point of view

Kozuch • Wed 07 of Feb, 2007 (12:52 UTC)
No thumbnail for
I just would like to share some insights I got while using Bitweaver on one of my sites - it is called OpenBook Project and runs since May 2006.

I am an average webmaster I would say - I have basic web and internet knowledge, can use FTP, SSH (no money for dedicated hosting yet though) and I have basic HTML skills with close to none PHP skills. However, I can do some basic customizing of PHP scripts (like insert ads etc.) and I can do templating through Smarty with quite some effort.

I like to use a range of open source CMS beginning with Joomla (which I don't like that much though), over Drupal, XOOPS, forums like SMF and phpBB and finally ending with Bitweaver. I like the idea of sharing in the open source world - however this has it's cons too - many projects, even more forks and very unpredictable market. A bit of standardization would not be bad over here rolleyes.

I like Bitweaver, because it is the only one decent open source CMS (except TikiWiki of course) that has all the main features under one roof - articles, blogs, calendar, forum, galleries and a wiki. You never know when you will need the particular feature your current CMS does not offer and migrating is a bad thing.


Note: This post is a reprint from a Webmastering Bitweaver blog that is public and you are welcome to share your thoughts there! mrgreen

Comments

Reply to this comment

Yes, but...

by Art, Sunday 08 of April, 2007 (05:18:15 UTC)
I agree, some standardization would be great. But without a market, how will be ever move to a standard solution?
I also wanted to see comments work.
Reply to this comment

Re: Yes, but...

by Kozuch, Tuesday 10 of April, 2007 (20:29:44 UTC)
The comments work obviously... wink