Does bitweaver deserve a Wikipedia page?
Kozuch • 11 Mar 2008 (07:22 UTC)
It seems we are facing similar problem like the guys from Openbravo - bitweaver has been actively deleted from Wikipedia. After several failed attempts to create the page, it was even deleted from the List of content management systems. The Bitweaver Wikipedia "issue" should be resolved as fast as possible.
With all its pros, Wikipedia can be nicely rude with special set of factors. In bitweaver's case this meant people biased or absolutely not knowing what they were speaking about in the deletion discussions and blind admins. You can amuse yourself with the article logs then only.
Given you are the same believing fool as me, you can do one of the following:
Take care,
Kozuch
With all its pros, Wikipedia can be nicely rude with special set of factors. In bitweaver's case this meant people biased or absolutely not knowing what they were speaking about in the deletion discussions and blind admins. You can amuse yourself with the article logs then only.
Given you are the same believing fool as me, you can do one of the following:
- participate in the deletion review (update: closed for now)
- talk to the admin
- or commnet on the talk page
Take care,
Kozuch
Comments
Just put 'wikipedia sucks' into google - 1/2 a million hits!
The problem is there are too many alternatives BECAUSE wikipedia is so disliked and we need a shakedown so that a smaller number get wider support :(
Follow a good example
Anyway good luck :-)
Re: Follow a good example
The wikipedia things sucks, because wikipedia is fundamentally flawed by it's strict adherence to the Penny Arcade Greater Internet @#$%wad Theory. That we cannot fix, and should not fight. However, I suggest we put all of our effort into getting reviewed, as that will solve two problems at once (more exposure, and securing an wikipedia entry).
Se vi può interessare, sarei felice di pubblicare una recensione di bitweaver sul mio sito vostroportale.it
bitweaver upgrade
I have to upgrade bitweaver 2.0.0 pre alph to latest stable version 2.0.2 on a production system.
What care to be taken without disturbing the current version.
Need help asap!!
Thanks in advance,
RK